[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
- Subject: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
- From: davidbass570 at gmail.com (David Bass)
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:42:19 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAC6=tfaR43LSW2YPBK3GQR4g057rO85WMQaHKkpJftt0M-7PiQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAGy+NY0R+9fBSRH5RKNc7mp4aF4B3K0c+CTwVuSakHsfF8r0ng@mail.gmail.com> <CAO-ok8Rfq5WDHzLFGfgvmrhE9A14Ztw0waaxhM8Coo_fj=buvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC6=tfaYDaLLSHWcSg1ybkEB_CKVvtDrpShCSzPjDVFcQbhimw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAC6=tfaR43LSW2YPBK3GQR4g057rO85WMQaHKkpJftt0M-7PiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Are you sure those other vendors don't do it too? Lol.
Dual stack ISIS on Juniper is a thing of beauty...
> On Nov 10, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Josh Reynolds <josh at kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
>
> Cisco is the only "real" IS-IS vendor.
>
> Juniper, Brocade, Arista, Avaya, etc you're not getting it. Any of the
> whitebox hardware or real SDN capable solutions, you're going to be on OSPF.
>
>> On Nov 10, 2016 12:13 AM, "Mark Tinka" <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/Nov/16 04:52, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>
>> Vendor support for IS-IS is quite limited - many options for OSPF.
>>
>>
>> Depends on the vendor.
>>
>> Cisco have as many knobs for IS-IS as they do for OSPF.
>>
>> Juniper, not so much.
>>
>> Don't know about other vendors.
>>
>> At any rate, many of these knobs are not part of the original protocol
>> spec., although they can be very useful when scaling.
>>
>> Mark.
>>