[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
- Subject: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
- From: josh at kyneticwifi.com (Josh Reynolds)
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:44:08 -0600
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAC6=tfaYDaLLSHWcSg1ybkEB_CKVvtDrpShCSzPjDVFcQbhimw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAC6=tfaR43LSW2YPBK3GQR4g057rO85WMQaHKkpJftt0M-7PiQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
Juniper of their own merits, but they miss many of the IS-IS features
Cisco has (of course).
Huawei has very "Cisco-like" code, so there's that...
Can't speak for Nokia.
On Nov 10, 2016 12:22 PM, <sthaug at nethelp.no> wrote:
> > Cisco is the only "real" IS-IS vendor.
> >
> > Juniper, Brocade, Arista, Avaya, etc you're not getting it. Any of the
> > whitebox hardware or real SDN capable solutions, you're going to be on
> OSPF.
>
> Maybe you need to tell us what the other companies aren't getting?
> We're using IS-IS on (mostly) Juniper and Huawei, but also Alcatel/
> Lucent/Nokia and Cisco. It just works.
>
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
>