[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
- Subject: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
- From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 07:37:38 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAC6=tfaR43LSW2YPBK3GQR4g057rO85WMQaHKkpJftt0M-7PiQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAGy+NY0R+9fBSRH5RKNc7mp4aF4B3K0c+CTwVuSakHsfF8r0ng@mail.gmail.com> <CAO-ok8Rfq5WDHzLFGfgvmrhE9A14Ztw0waaxhM8Coo_fj=buvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC6=tfaYDaLLSHWcSg1ybkEB_CKVvtDrpShCSzPjDVFcQbhimw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAC6=tfaR43LSW2YPBK3GQR4g057rO85WMQaHKkpJftt0M-7PiQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/Nov/16 20:01, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> Cisco is the only "real" IS-IS vendor.
>
> Juniper, Brocade, Arista, Avaya, etc you're not getting it. Any of the
> whitebox hardware or real SDN capable solutions, you're going to be on
> OSPF.
>
We are quite happy with our Cisco-Juniper IS-IS interactions.
Granted, IOS, IOS XE and IOS XR all have several IS-IS knobs that
Juniper don't, but in all fairness, we aren't complaining.
We have the right knobs in the right place on each vendor kit to run a
successful IGP domain.
Mark.