[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Nat

Subject: Nat
From: mel at beckman.org (Mel Beckman)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:14:20 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <D29747F0.11F8D4%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAAbPayKVqf7r=77Jjks8WJOgm5eqFpD4OqUyTopKBPa2TRvQNA@mail.gmail.com>, <[email protected]>

Mark,

Why? Why do WE "need" to force people to bend to our will? The market will get us all there eventually. 

I don't like what you eat. Lets put a surcharge on it to make you feel pain and do what I want. :)

 -mel beckman

> On Dec 16, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:
> 
> This doesn't put pain on those that have enough addresses that they don't need
> to NAT yet.  We need to put some pain onto everyone that is IPv4 only.
> 
> Mark
> 
>> On 17/12/2015, at 10:39 AM, Charles Monson <charles.lists at camonson.com> wrote:
>> 
>> We need to make IPv4 painful to use.  Adding  delay between SYN and SYN/ACK would
>> be one way to achieve this.  Start at 100ms..200ms and increase it by 100ms each year.
>> 
>> It seems like NAT would be another way to make IPv4 more painful to use.
>

Follow-Ups:
- Nat
  - From: larrysheldon at cox.net (Larry Sheldon)
- Nat
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- Nat
  - From: list at satchell.net (Stephen Satchell)
- Nat
  - From: Lee at asgard.org (Lee Howard)

References:
- Nat
  - From: ahmed.dalaali at hrins.net (Ahmed Munaf)
- Nat
  - From: Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com (Livingood, Jason)
- Nat
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- Nat
  - From: charles.lists at camonson.com (Charles Monson)
- Nat
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)

Prev by Date: Nat
Next by Date: Nat
Previous by thread: Nat
Next by thread: Nat
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread