[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Nat

Subject: Nat
From: larrysheldon at cox.net (Larry Sheldon)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:28:17 -0600
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <D29747F0.11F8D4%[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 12/16/2015 17:28, Mark Andrews wrote:
> +1000000
>
> Nobody should have to be doing NAT today.
>
> We need to make IPv4 painful to use.  Adding  delay between SYN and
> SYN/ACK would be one way to achieve this.  Start at 100ms..200ms and
> increase it by 100ms each year.


If it is such a good idea, why do you have to do that?




-- 
sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

References:
- Nat
  - From: ahmed.dalaali at hrins.net (Ahmed Munaf)
- Nat
  - From: Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com (Livingood, Jason)
- Nat
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)

Prev by Date: Nat
Next by Date: Nat
Previous by thread: Nat
Next by thread: Nat
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread