Nat

[marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)]

While we will get us there eventually it will be at the considerably more expensive
for everyone involved.  There is also a distinct lack of a working free market in most
of the world.  There isn't one in Australia.  From what I read there isn't one in most
of the developed nations in the world including the US.

Mark

On 17/12/2015, at 11:14 AM, Mel Beckman <mel at beckman.org> wrote:

> Mark,
> 
> Why? Why do WE "need" to force people to bend to our will? The market will get us all there eventually. 
> 
> I don't like what you eat. Lets put a surcharge on it to make you feel pain and do what I want. :)
> 
> -mel beckman
> 
>> On Dec 16, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:
>> 
>> This doesn't put pain on those that have enough addresses that they don't need
>> to NAT yet.  We need to put some pain onto everyone that is IPv4 only.
>> 
>> Mark
>> 
>>> On 17/12/2015, at 10:39 AM, Charles Monson <charles.lists at camonson.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We need to make IPv4 painful to use.  Adding  delay between SYN and SYN/ACK would
>>> be one way to achieve this.  Start at 100ms..200ms and increase it by 100ms each year.
>>> 
>>> It seems like NAT would be another way to make IPv4 more painful to use.
>>