[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Carrier Grade NAT
- Subject: Carrier Grade NAT
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:57:54 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAMDdSzNABh=OtkQn52xJLaY=h26Ho3Bkk54aVSJTXeDXsO30MQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Jul 29, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Chris Boyd <cboyd at gizmopartners.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 29, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
>> If law enforcement comes along without port numbers then you give them a list of subscribers behind that IP at the time. Use port block allocation and keep track of the blocks to reduce logging load.
>
> There's probably going to be some interesting legal fallout from that practice. As an ISP customer, I'd be furious to find out that my communications had been intercepted due to the bad behavior of another user.
>
> --Chris
As an ISP customer, would you really accept not being supplied a globally unique address? Really? I would not.
Owen