[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Carrier Grade NAT

Subject: Carrier Grade NAT
From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:59:16 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAMDdSzNABh=OtkQn52xJLaY=h26Ho3Bkk54aVSJTXeDXsO30MQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> As an ISP customer, would you really accept not
>being supplied a globally unique address? Really?

Hi Owen,

I wouldn't, but outside of the folks I know in this forum, few would
notice or care. So long as the ISP has an alternative available for
those who do care (such as an existing static IP request mechanism)
CGNs are low-risk from a customer-acceptance position.

Regards,
Bill Herrin

-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
Can I solve your unusual networking challenges?

Follow-Ups:
- Carrier Grade NAT
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

References:
- Carrier Grade NAT
  - From: colton.conor at gmail.com (Colton Conor)
- Carrier Grade NAT
  - From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)
- Carrier Grade NAT
  - From: cboyd at gizmopartners.com (Chris Boyd)
- Carrier Grade NAT
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

Prev by Date: Carrier Grade NAT
Next by Date: Many players make up application performance (was Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity)
Previous by thread: Carrier Grade NAT
Next by thread: Carrier Grade NAT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread