[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Carrier Grade NAT
- Subject: Carrier Grade NAT
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:54:57 -0400
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:42:31 -0500." <[email protected]>
- References: <CAMDdSzNABh=OtkQn52xJLaY=h26Ho3Bkk54aVSJTXeDXsO30MQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:42:31 -0500, Chris Boyd said:
> There's probably going to be some interesting legal fallout from that
> practice. As an ISP customer, I'd be furious to find out that my
> communications had been intercepted due to the bad behavior of another user.
See the various lawsuits against the NSA - the vast majority have been summarily
dismissed because the plaintiffs couldn't produce evidence their communications
had in fact been intercepted, and thus they didn't have standing to sue.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140729/4851db9c/attachment.pgp>