[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

Subject: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:54:04 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote:
> I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part of the v6 internet 

Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to renumber?

Regards,
-drc

Follow-Ups:
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: felipe at starbyte.net (Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: nenolod at systeminplace.net (William Pitcock)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: paul at telcodata.us (Paul Timmins)

References:
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John R. Levine)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: andy at nosignal.org (Andy Davidson)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: davei at otd.com (Dave Israel)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org (Mark Smith)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: matthew at matthew.at (Matthew Kaufman)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org (Mark Smith)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: crosevear at skytap.com (Carl Rosevear)

Prev by Date: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Next by Date: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Previous by thread: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Next by thread: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread