[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

Subject: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:07:15 +1000
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:54:04 MST." <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

In message <01F57362-8092-48CB-8336-15B9CC1713C2 at virtualized.org>, David Conrad
 writes:
> On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote:
> > I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part =
> of the v6 internet=20
> 
> Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to =
> renumber?

We have that ability already.  Doesn't require NAT.

> Regards,
> -drc
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org

Follow-Ups:
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)

References:
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John R. Levine)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: andy at nosignal.org (Andy Davidson)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: davei at otd.com (Dave Israel)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org (Mark Smith)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: matthew at matthew.at (Matthew Kaufman)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org (Mark Smith)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: crosevear at skytap.com (Carl Rosevear)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)

Prev by Date: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Next by Date: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Previous by thread: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Next by thread: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread