[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

Subject: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:36:24 -0400
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:54:04 PDT." <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:54:04 PDT, David Conrad said:
> On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote:
> > I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part
> > of the v6 internet
> 
> Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to renumber?

RFC4193 or PI address space, depending what problem you're trying to solve
by not renumbering.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20100429/51bd99e0/attachment.bin>

References:
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John R. Levine)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: andy at nosignal.org (Andy Davidson)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: davei at otd.com (Dave Israel)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org (Mark Smith)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: matthew at matthew.at (Matthew Kaufman)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org (Mark Smith)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: crosevear at skytap.com (Carl Rosevear)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)

Prev by Date: [only half OT] A socio-psychological analysis of the first internet war (Estonia)
Next by Date: wanted: your old NAT home router
Previous by thread: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Next by thread: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread