[cryptome] Re: NatSecGeek

[tbiehn@gmail.com (Travis Biehn)]

*wiggles eyebrows* didn't think that would take this long to mention.

Don't forget the conspicuous use of gmail and suspiciously legitimate names.

Can't trust em.

-Travis

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015, 12:46 PM Shelley <shelley@misanthropia.org> wrote:

> On October 12, 2015 9:31:40 AM Razer <Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > His use of a sig with all his social networks is one of the reasons I
> > earlier said Best has some income-related motive, and that he's most
> > likely dealing in 'future rewards'. After all BB is a contributor to the
> > intercept and even that cheap ass street panhandler "Commander X" aka
> > 'curbhugger chris' got a whole damn writeup in the New Yorker.
> >
> > RR
> >
>
> Razor, what has gotten into you?
>
> The only social network sig block I've seen is this:
>
> ---
>  Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn> | GitHub <
> http://github.com/tbiehn>
> | TravisBiehn.com <http://www.travisbiehn.com> | Google Plus
> <https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn>
> --
>
> There has been a lot of noise on the list so I could have missed it, but I
> don't recall seeing Mike post anything like that (whereas the above is
> posted in each of Travis's replies, and I don't see you calling him out for
> it.)  Georgi asked Mike if he was NatSecGeek, that's the only time I recall
> his Twatter being mentioned.
>
> If you're going to attack someone, at least get the facts straight.
>
> -S
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151012/0971e409/attachment.html>