[cryptome] Re: [cryptome]

[themikebest@gmail.com (Michael Best)]

>
> Maybe because Mike _published_ the fucking logs, just because JYA was
> doing the mirror shades thing about whether the archive was or was not
> genuine? I mean, JYA can be a very funny man. For sure. But does that
> justify publishing Cryptome access logs?


I published them to verify the data, *AFTER JYA publicly accused me of
FAKING it.* I only raised the point of the logs because of the GCHQ slide. *If
*John had verified it a week earlier, or not accused me of faking data
(with ZERO evidence, and the data turns out to be legit) *they never
would've been published. *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151009/3541f896/attachment.html>