[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cryptome] Re: NatSecGeek
Yep. Thought tacit acknowledgment in first answer was clear, but like it
was lost in translation as too often happens with email. My fault. Ad
hominem anticipation was in response to the bombing comment.
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Georgi Guninski <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:14:57AM -0400, Michael Best wrote:
> > Here's the windup... and the pitch...
> > It looks like it's gonna be an ad hominem!
> > Best doesn't swing at it. Ball one.
> >
>
> In case you can't understand the question, are you this?:
> https://twitter.com/NatSecGeek
> According to:
> http://www.dailydot.com/politics/cryptome-ip-leak-john-young-michael-best/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151010/a45f17e3/attachment.html>