[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Telegram vs. Unhandled Expression
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Telegram vs. Unhandled Expression
- From: [email protected] (Ted Smith)
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 22:44:23 -0500
- In-reply-to: <10324222.IxXungcVdZ@lap>
- References: <2004853.kmbRfK3vsB@lap> <1714654.Be1CP781r2@lap> <CAHWD2rLbYB3v8+fGwQ1R+LTXCb=6CnwoMQihHEqcggeS4a2pww@mail.gmail.com> <10324222.IxXungcVdZ@lap>
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 02:54 +0100, rysiek wrote:
> Dnia Å?roda, 26 lutego 2014 02:42:49 Lodewijk andré de la porte pisze:
> > 2014-02-26 1:44 GMT+01:00 rysiek <[email protected]>:
> > > Well, what kind of philantropist would start a UNIX alternative, right? ;)
> >
> > That's at least a kind that winds all his costs off on his university. A
> > very understandable kind.
>
> I have no idea how and where to the Telegram crew "winds" their costs. Nor do
> I care, as long as the communication is secured even from their own potential
> meddling.
>
> So the question is: is it?
A contest isn't the way to show it:
http://thoughtcrime.org/blog/telegram-crypto-challenge/
--
Sent from Ubuntu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20140225/de9a442d/attachment.sig>