[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Telegram vs. Unhandled Expression
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Telegram vs. Unhandled Expression
- From: [email protected] (rysiek)
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 02:54:46 +0100
- In-reply-to: <CAHWD2rLbYB3v8+fGwQ1R+LTXCb=6CnwoMQihHEqcggeS4a2pww@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <2004853.kmbRfK3vsB@lap> <1714654.Be1CP781r2@lap> <CAHWD2rLbYB3v8+fGwQ1R+LTXCb=6CnwoMQihHEqcggeS4a2pww@mail.gmail.com>
Dnia Å?roda, 26 lutego 2014 02:42:49 Lodewijk andré de la porte pisze:
> 2014-02-26 1:44 GMT+01:00 rysiek <[email protected]>:
> > Well, what kind of philantropist would start a UNIX alternative, right? ;)
>
> That's at least a kind that winds all his costs off on his university. A
> very understandable kind.
I have no idea how and where to the Telegram crew "winds" their costs. Nor do
I care, as long as the communication is secured even from their own potential
meddling.
So the question is: is it?
--
Pozdr
rysiek
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20140226/837214b1/attachment.sig>