[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Telegram vs. Unhandled Expression

To: [email protected]
Subject: Telegram vs. Unhandled Expression
From: [email protected] (rysiek)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:44:59 +0100
In-reply-to: <CAHWD2rKr9cM7VROQC6QwoCDsWFMXZS_-ytBH3B56XDwbLMR14w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2004853.kmbRfK3vsB@lap> <CAHWD2rKr9cM7VROQC6QwoCDsWFMXZS_-ytBH3B56XDwbLMR14w@mail.gmail.com>

Dnia Å?roda, 26 lutego 2014 01:33:55 Lodewijk andrÃ© de la porte pisze:
> They're not asking you to break Telegram, they're asking you to break the
> crypto. Breaking Telegram's servers is probably the easier way in.

Well, if you break-in and get the message contents from the servers, as far as 
I understand you do win the challenge, so...

> Either way, there Telegram guys have no profit model at all. I prefer the
> evil I know. What kind of philanthropist would start a whatsapp alternative?

Well, what kind of philantropist would start a UNIX alternative, right? ;)

-- 
Pozdr
rysiek
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20140226/ca96df57/attachment.sig>

References:
- Telegram vs. Unhandled Expression
  - From: [email protected] (rysiek)
- Telegram vs. Unhandled Expression
  - From: [email protected] (Lodewijk andré de la porte)

Prev by Date: Telegram vs. Unhandled Expression
Next by Date: Telegram vs. Unhandled Expression
Previous by thread: Telegram vs. Unhandled Expression
Next by thread: Telegram vs. Unhandled Expression
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread