[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Patch vs. crossover cables
- Subject: [ale] Patch vs. crossover cables
- From: hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:32:24 -0500
- In-reply-to: <20060226191818.GB10086@chameleon>
- References: <20060226191818.GB10086@chameleon>
No need for a crossover unless you're going NIC to NIC or hub/switch to
hub/switch, unless hub/switch in question has a "convertible" port for
the purpose.
Trey Sizemore wrote:
>I've got a box with 3 NICs I'm going to setup as a firewall. One NIC
>connected to my DSL modem, one NIC for my internal network, and one for
>a DMZ. The DMZ and internal networks will have more than one PC on
>them, so I have a couple of hubs.
>
>My question is, given this architecture (with no PCs directly connected
>to one another, only to hubs) is there any need for a crossover cable,
>or will all cables needed be standard patch cables?
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ale mailing list
>Ale at ale.org
>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>