[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Patch vs. crossover cables
- Subject: [ale] Patch vs. crossover cables
- From: danlambert at bellsouth.net (Dan Lambert)
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:30:35 -0500
- In-reply-to: <20060226191818.GB10086@chameleon>
All of them can be standard patch cables, Trey.
Dan Lambert
-----Original Message-----
From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of Trey
To: ale at ale.org
Sizemore
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 2:18 PM
To: ale at ale.org
Subject: [ale] Patch vs. crossover cables
I've got a box with 3 NICs I'm going to setup as a firewall. One NIC
connected to my DSL modem, one NIC for my internal network, and one for a
DMZ. The DMZ and internal networks will have more than one PC on them, so I
have a couple of hubs.
My question is, given this architecture (with no PCs directly connected to
one another, only to hubs) is there any need for a crossover cable, or will
all cables needed be standard patch cables?
--
Cheers,
Trey
----
Love and scandal are the best sweeteners of tea.
Linux chameleon 2.6.13-15-default i686 GNU/Linux
2:15pm up 2 days 20:24, 5 users, load average: 0.05, 0.23, 0.28