[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Patch vs. crossover cables

Subject: [ale] Patch vs. crossover cables
From: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:17:09 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <20060226191818.GB10086@chameleon> <[email protected]>

Jeff Hubbs wrote:
> No need for a crossover unless you're going NIC to NIC or hub/switch to 
> hub/switch, unless hub/switch in question has a "convertible" port for 
> the purpose.

Many of the newer switches have autosensing so you can plug anything 
into them with a regular cable and it will work..

-- 
Until later, Geoffrey

War never solved anything, well, except slavery, fascism and communism

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] Patch vs. crossover cables
  - From: tcarter at entrusion.com (Tony Carter)

References:
- [ale] Patch vs. crossover cables
  - From: trey at fastmail.fm (Trey Sizemore)
- [ale] Patch vs. crossover cables
  - From: hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)

Prev by Date: [ale] scp file from Windows to Linux
Next by Date: [ale] Linux on Dell Dimension 9150?
Previous by thread: [ale] Patch vs. crossover cables
Next by thread: [ale] Patch vs. crossover cables
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread