[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Thu Apr 1 08:37:09 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: psbjyre ng bhgcbfgfragvary.pbz (Quevfgbcure Tbjyre) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1080785109.20913.123.camel@devel -->
- <!--x-reference: 00d601c4178f$65caacc0$53e04fd8@harclaptop -->
- <!--x-reference: 1080786082.20915.133.camel@devel -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Speed comparison -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu Apr 1 08:37:09 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00001.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <1080785109.20913.123.camel@devel> <00d601c4178f$65caacc0$53e04fd8@harclaptop> <1080786082.20915.133.camel@devel> <[email protected]> <<a href="msg00001.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Speed comparison</li>
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 06:06, Geoffrey wrote:
> Marvin Dickens wrote:
> >>> It does not, the P4s, especially the celerons are dogs. I have a
> >>> 1.8 GHz celeron and I swear my 800 MHz Athlon runs rings around
> >>> it. I've been underwhelmed by the p4 since there were introduced.
> >>> Any processor that is slower per clock tick than the previous
> >>> generation has something dreadfully wrong. If you must do P4,
> >>> get a real one, not the celeron.
> >>
> >> Thanks. It looks as if I'll be skipping the system due to the
> >> Intel tax. The XP must be better.
> >
> >
> > FWIW, I always go with AMD. The only disadvantage I know of is that
> > AMD processors are destroyed in the event of an unnoticed CPU fan
> > failure occurs. OTOH, the Intel chips automatically shut themselves
> > down when a fan failure occurs and the temperature rises too high.
>
> They now have athlon mb that will shutdown in the same way. I've got
> two, but I've not tested it. :)
>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00047" href="msg00047.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ups at tree.com (Stephan Uphoff)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00001" href="msg00001.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00008.html">[ale] Partially OT: moving apps from old to new PC's(non-Linux)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00010.html">[ale] Partially OT: moving apps from old to new PC's(non-Linux)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00001.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00047.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00009"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00009"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>