[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Speed comparison
- Subject: [ale] Speed comparison
- From: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)
- Date: Thu Apr 1 08:37:09 2004
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <1080785109.20913.123.camel@devel> <00d601c4178f$65caacc0$53e04fd8@harclaptop> <1080786082.20915.133.camel@devel> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
I'm looking in the lates dirty magazine (Computer User). We call them
the dirty magazine because of the lust they create. I guess I can get an
XP-2400+ for $74.99 and a PIV 2.4 for $145.99 Is there any difference
that warrants double price?
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 06:06, Geoffrey wrote:
> Marvin Dickens wrote:
> >>> It does not, the P4s, especially the celerons are dogs. I have a
> >>> 1.8 GHz celeron and I swear my 800 MHz Athlon runs rings around
> >>> it. I've been underwhelmed by the p4 since there were introduced.
> >>> Any processor that is slower per clock tick than the previous
> >>> generation has something dreadfully wrong. If you must do P4,
> >>> get a real one, not the celeron.
> >>
> >> Thanks. It looks as if I'll be skipping the system due to the
> >> Intel tax. The XP must be better.
> >
> >
> > FWIW, I always go with AMD. The only disadvantage I know of is that
> > AMD processors are destroyed in the event of an unnoticed CPU fan
> > failure occurs. OTOH, the Intel chips automatically shut themselves
> > down when a fan failure occurs and the temperature rises too high.
>
> They now have athlon mb that will shutdown in the same way. I've got
> two, but I've not tested it. :)
>