[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Speed comparison
- Subject: [ale] Speed comparison
- From: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)
- Date: Thu Apr 1 06:08:54 2004
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <1080785109.20913.123.camel@devel> <00d601c4178f$65caacc0$53e04fd8@harclaptop> <1080786082.20915.133.camel@devel> <[email protected]>
Marvin Dickens wrote:
>>> It does not, the P4s, especially the celerons are dogs. I have a
>>> 1.8 GHz celeron and I swear my 800 MHz Athlon runs rings around
>>> it. I've been underwhelmed by the p4 since there were introduced.
>>> Any processor that is slower per clock tick than the previous
>>> generation has something dreadfully wrong. If you must do P4,
>>> get a real one, not the celeron.
>>
>> Thanks. It looks as if I'll be skipping the system due to the
>> Intel tax. The XP must be better.
>
>
> FWIW, I always go with AMD. The only disadvantage I know of is that
> AMD processors are destroyed in the event of an unnoticed CPU fan
> failure occurs. OTOH, the Intel chips automatically shut themselves
> down when a fan failure occurs and the temperature rises too high.
They now have athlon mb that will shutdown in the same way. I've got
two, but I've not tested it. :)
--
Until later, Geoffrey Registered Linux User #108567
Building secure systems in spite of Microsoft