[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

plaintext email?

Subject: plaintext email?
From: gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net (Grant Taylor)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:43:21 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAL9jLaYkVVoE3j5dohE+SDLkXYhX=FA0eO8zNihUtA1M9AcTLQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAL9jLaYiH9kZ3z0BxJSRKso1jAY_NX119UKBbifS4wiB9Qff3w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 01/15/2019 11:37 AM, bzs at theworld.com wrote:
> P.S. No, you already read the quoted text, that's how it got to be 
> quoted text.

Are you making reference to having read the quoted text in a different 
email?

An email that someone might not have received, much less read yet?



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4008 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190115/dd244a5b/attachment.bin>

References:
- plaintext email?
  - From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- plaintext email?
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- plaintext email?
  - From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- plaintext email?
  - From: bzs at theworld.com (bzs at theworld.com)
- plaintext email?
  - From: valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu (valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu)
- plaintext email?
  - From: bzs at theworld.com (bzs at theworld.com)

Prev by Date: Your opinion on network analysis in the presence of uncertain events
Next by Date: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk...
Previous by thread: plaintext email?
Next by thread: plaintext email?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread