[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
plaintext email?
- Subject: plaintext email?
- From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:28:39 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAL9jLaYkVVoE3j5dohE+SDLkXYhX=FA0eO8zNihUtA1M9AcTLQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 3:52 PM John Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:
> In article <CAL9jLaYkVVoE3j5dohE+SDLkXYhX=
> FA0eO8zNihUtA1M9AcTLQ at mail.gmail.com> you write:
> >
> >Isn't the underlying assumption with non-plaintext that: "I know what will
> >work better for you than you do" ...
>
> No, it's that every MUA in the world has handled html mail for a decade
> and it's a waste of time to piss into the wind.
>
the breeze is so nice though.
> I send most of my mail as unformatted text, but my MUA (alpine)
> renders incoming HTML just fine. Time to get over it and waste time
> arguing about something else pointless, like when to capitalize internet.
>
>
well we COULD argue about 'inline comment' or 'top posting' ...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190114/7bb77595/attachment.html>