[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RIPE our of IPv4
- Subject: RIPE our of IPv4
- From: large.hadron.collider at gmx.com (Large Hadron Collider)
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 14:46:05 -0800
- In-reply-to: <CAO1bj=YOA_jyc__xvhDthZ753WuJhpS_kSwZ9XedD--HqQd6EQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <441518.1574718457@turing-police> <[email protected]> <99858.1575340316@turing-police> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAO1bj=YOA_jyc__xvhDthZ753WuJhpS_kSwZ9XedD--HqQd6EQ@mail.gmail.com>
that would be a throwback, if my MTA supported full-length bangpaths.
On 19-12-04 01 h 56, Aled Morris via NANOG wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 14:43, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com
> <mailto:randy at psg.com>> wrote:
>
> > Why does a new organisation need to have any global IPv4
> addresses of
> > their own at all?
>
> if all folk saying such things would make their in- and out-bound mail
> servers v6-only, it would reduce confusion in this area.
>
> randy
>
>
> ...!6to4mx!m2xenix!randy
>
> Aled
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20191205/e994b4cc/attachment.html>