[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RIPE our of IPv4

Subject: RIPE our of IPv4
From: aled.w.morris at googlemail.com (Aled Morris)
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:56:52 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <441518.1574718457@turing-police> <[email protected]> <99858.1575340316@turing-police> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 14:43, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:

> > Why does a new organisation need to have any global IPv4 addresses of
> > their own at all?
>
> if all folk saying such things would make their in- and out-bound mail
> servers v6-only, it would reduce confusion in this area.
>
> randy
>

...!6to4mx!m2xenix!randy

Aled
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20191204/49d72fb7/attachment.html>

Follow-Ups:
- RIPE our of IPv4
  - From: large.hadron.collider at gmx.com (Large Hadron Collider)

References:
- RIPE our of IPv4
  - From: valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis Klētnieks)
- RIPE our of IPv4
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- RIPE our of IPv4
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)

Prev by Date: Gmail email blocking is off the rails (again)
Next by Date: CBS Geolocation
Previous by thread: RIPE our of IPv4
Next by thread: RIPE our of IPv4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread