[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
modeling residential subscriber bandwidth demand
- Subject: modeling residential subscriber bandwidth demand
- From: ben at 6by7.net (Ben Cannon)
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 23:53:06 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAF664Dzx0LgSCq+zEdTzfnL9+=ODoySwhO_W0u9w8-=CQew4xA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAJL_ZMN5cdc6sq+cZytroJnyvdxoGwvA5a=GO73+5TpSr_0dtw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP7ff458ctGinWK57SAPTYngBD7SNm5kU7=wBNv=DYxxSLic5Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
A 100/100 enterprise connection can easily support hundreds of desktop users if not more. Itâ??s a lot of bandwidth even today.
-Ben
> On Apr 2, 2019, at 10:35 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, Paul Nash wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, I have a 250 subscribers sitting on a 100M fiber into Torix. I have had no complains about speed in 4 1/2 years. I have been planning to bump them to 1G for the last 4 years, but there is currently no economic justification.
>
> I know FTTH footprints where peak evening average per customer is 3-5 megabit/s. I know others who claim their customers only average equivalent 5-10% of that.
>
> It all depends on what services you offer. Considering my household has 250/100 for 40 USD a month I'd say your above solution wouldn't even be enough to deliver an acceptable service to even 10 households.
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se