[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
modeling residential subscriber bandwidth demand
- Subject: modeling residential subscriber bandwidth demand
- From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 07:35:21 +0200 (CEST)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAF664Dzx0LgSCq+zEdTzfnL9+=ODoySwhO_W0u9w8-=CQew4xA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAJL_ZMN5cdc6sq+cZytroJnyvdxoGwvA5a=GO73+5TpSr_0dtw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP7ff458ctGinWK57SAPTYngBD7SNm5kU7=wBNv=DYxxSLic5Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, Paul Nash wrote:
> FWIW, I have a 250 subscribers sitting on a 100M fiber into Torix. I
> have had no complains about speed in 4 1/2 years. I have been planning
> to bump them to 1G for the last 4 years, but there is currently no
> economic justification.
I know FTTH footprints where peak evening average per customer is 3-5
megabit/s. I know others who claim their customers only average equivalent
5-10% of that.
It all depends on what services you offer. Considering my household has
250/100 for 40 USD a month I'd say your above solution wouldn't even be
enough to deliver an acceptable service to even 10 households.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se