[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

NANOG Security Track: Route Security

Subject: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
From: job at instituut.net (Job Snijders)
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 12:12:42 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAKTMEKPAJH4NXOT=_hoPCneBdo7H4WDGeDeqkEEHu-nDSf9g-w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKTMEKOx0+px0729YSQnEEGxwWqv25YQE7aKYi7jpANQ-2xxBg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFwHH1YDxfhE2=wW+uWmqykYnb2o-4Z0_kaeC-eDGF=Zxv_Znw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKTMEKORizPkyzbytv0fk9KO_izKDrykNn0uGzyFEFV3bJbKwA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CA+cYV6tp2rOUHyyb=KmUZe1pwh+jOyqRcoKrY_jkihY5ML9g7w@mail.gmail.com> <CAHK+Bt8iwwA8fsTjm4t5k3V_pbYOAswGbS-uRcH=bBE6i7-KbQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

Perhaps the moderator and the presenters for this track can figure out (off
list!) if there is unanimous support to record the session and reconsider.

Kind regards,

Job
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20181001/15f576ee/attachment.html>

References:
- NANOG Security Track: Route Security
  - From: jtk at depaul.edu (John Kristoff)
- NANOG Security Track: Route Security
  - From: netravnen at gmail.com (Netravnen)
- NANOG Security Track: Route Security
  - From: rwoolleynanog at gmail.com (Ryan Woolley)
- NANOG Security Track: Route Security
  - From: Ryan.Hamel at quadranet.com (Ryan Hamel)

Prev by Date: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
Next by Date: Towards an RPKI-rich Internet (and the appropriate allocation of responsibility in the event an RIR RPKI CA outage)
Previous by thread: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
Next by thread: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread