[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NANOG Security Track: Route Security
- Subject: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
- From: netravnen at gmail.com (Netravnen)
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 14:14:26 +0200
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAKTMEKPAJH4NXOT=_hoPCneBdo7H4WDGeDeqkEEHu-nDSf9g-w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKTMEKOx0+px0729YSQnEEGxwWqv25YQE7aKYi7jpANQ-2xxBg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFwHH1YDxfhE2=wW+uWmqykYnb2o-4Z0_kaeC-eDGF=Zxv_Znw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKTMEKORizPkyzbytv0fk9KO_izKDrykNn0uGzyFEFV3bJbKwA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 14:01, John Kristoff <jtk at depaul.edu> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 03:27:49 +0000
> Ryan Hamel <Ryan.Hamel at quadranet.com> wrote:
>
> > Just like how all the email threads on NANOG are archived, all talks
> > should be archived as well.
>
> Whether to record a session or not is up to the presenter and track
> coordinator.
I would prefer if NANOG would record sessions by default! (And allow
presenters to opt-out if they really feel like it.)
Other conferences I have had participated to in the past. Had the
option of allowing opt-out of being recorded on stage.