[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NANOG Security Track: Route Security
- Subject: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
- From: jbothe at me.com (JASON BOTHE)
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:38:40 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAKTMEKPAJH4NXOT=_hoPCneBdo7H4WDGeDeqkEEHu-nDSf9g-w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKTMEKOx0+px0729YSQnEEGxwWqv25YQE7aKYi7jpANQ-2xxBg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFwHH1YDxfhE2=wW+uWmqykYnb2o-4Z0_kaeC-eDGF=Zxv_Znw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKTMEKORizPkyzbytv0fk9KO_izKDrykNn0uGzyFEFV3bJbKwA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Agreed, especially if theyâ??re an active member of the organization and doesnâ??t seem to be synonymous with NANOGs Charter.
Jason
On Sep 30, 2018, at 22:41, Brian Kantor <Brian at ampr.org> wrote:
>> To ensure unimpeded information sharing and discussion, the
>> Security Track will not be broadcast or recorded.
>
> I fail to understand how making the presentations secret from all
> except those attending in person promotes information sharing.
> Could whoever made this seemingly contradictory decision explain
> the reasoning behind it?
> - Brian
>