[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

NANOG Security Track: Route Security

Subject: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
From: Brian at ampr.org (Brian Kantor)
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 20:41:20 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAKTMEKPAJH4NXOT=_hoPCneBdo7H4WDGeDeqkEEHu-nDSf9g-w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKTMEKOx0+px0729YSQnEEGxwWqv25YQE7aKYi7jpANQ-2xxBg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFwHH1YDxfhE2=wW+uWmqykYnb2o-4Z0_kaeC-eDGF=Zxv_Znw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKTMEKORizPkyzbytv0fk9KO_izKDrykNn0uGzyFEFV3bJbKwA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

> To ensure unimpeded information sharing and discussion, the
> Security Track will not be broadcast or recorded.

I fail to understand how making the presentations secret from all
except those attending in person promotes information sharing.
Could whoever made this seemingly contradictory decision explain
the reasoning behind it?
	- Brian

Follow-Ups:
- NANOG Security Track: Route Security
  - From: jbothe at me.com (JASON BOTHE)

References:
- NANOG Security Track: Route Security
  - From: Ryan.Hamel at quadranet.com (Ryan Hamel)

Prev by Date: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
Next by Date: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
Previous by thread: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
Next by thread: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread