[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
- Subject: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
- From: sthaug at nethelp.no (sthaug at nethelp.no)
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 07:22:47 +0100 (CET)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAC6=tfaJYGQmJqfcC+mT5RF=KmOiX69gQEqTDQFYGkRf4G=4sQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> > I think people were looking for specifics about the implementation
> > deficits in the junos version which caused enough problems to justify
> > the term "not getting it"?
>
> The only IS-IS implementation we struggle with is Quagga.
>
> For that, we run OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 on Quagga and redistribute that into
> the IS-IS core.
>
> Use-case is Anycast (DNS, NTP, TACACS+, e.t.c.) on FreeBSD.
We have a similar use case, and we run BGP on Quagga. Works great.
Haven't seen a need for either IS-IS or OSPF on Quagga yet.
For our core IGP it's IS-IS all the way. We switched from OSPF to
IS-IS more than 10 years ago, and never regretted it.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no