[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX

Subject: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 08:47:05 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7ApSOtGJg_E+LECSA83qVmVEeG82cbrfX_5M22KPGr57Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CALgsdbfkth3YXg6xzUoOhRzkobgGie5i0f4uq-f2cjFFSF8dWg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAB8g2zy0otuuXYPTw=ts4YDox-Q+Y-RMgjFatLVWuttR0g2Cxg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>


On 2/Mar/16 19:25, Peter Phaal wrote:

> The Nexus 3200 should work well with 100G flows - I believe it's based on the latest Broadcom Tomahawk ASIC. The older Trident II ASICs in the Nexus 9k are 40g parts.

Yes, the new Tomahawk chips support native 100Gbps lanes.

Mark.

References:
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: peter.phaal at gmail.com (Peter Phaal)
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: peter.phaal at gmail.com (Peter Phaal)

Prev by Date: About inetnum "ownership"
Next by Date: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
Previous by thread: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
Next by thread: New survey report published: The regulatory conditions of internet interconnection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread