[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX

Subject: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 16:13:33 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7ApSOtGJg_E+LECSA83qVmVEeG82cbrfX_5M22KPGr57Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CALgsdbfkth3YXg6xzUoOhRzkobgGie5i0f4uq-f2cjFFSF8dWg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>


On 29/Feb/16 12:15, Nikolay Shopik wrote:

> Cisco Nexus switches support sflow, since they are broadcom based.

Not all of them, just the Nexus 9000, IIRC.

Mark.

Follow-Ups:
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: shopik+lists at nvcube.net (Nikolay Shopik)
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: peter.phaal at gmail.com (Peter Phaal)

Prev by Date: New survey report published: The regulatory conditions of internet interconnection
Next by Date: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
Previous by thread: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
Next by thread: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread