[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
- Subject: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
- From: shopik+lists at nvcube.net (Nikolay Shopik)
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 18:07:12 +0300
- In-reply-to: <CALgsdbdFbkD=mLoC4po846b=dQNGcOAh4bxFEw0Lb4mDkFiTSQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7ApSOtGJg_E+LECSA83qVmVEeG82cbrfX_5M22KPGr57Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CALgsdbfkth3YXg6xzUoOhRzkobgGie5i0f4uq-f2cjFFSF8dWg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CALgsdbdFbkD=mLoC4po846b=dQNGcOAh4bxFEw0Lb4mDkFiTSQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/03/16 10:44, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
> But unfortunately they (Cisco Nexus) are pretty expensive and fairly
> new for DC and ISP market. It's pretty rare to find big company with
> switching backbone on Nexus switches.
You could go with withbox switches, which is based on same broadcom
ASIC, but this means you have to deal with new commercial NOS and learn
its quirks.
Or you could hack around with OpenSwitch and ask Broadcom to include you
favorite vendor/model into OpenNSL, so you could actually use ASIC w/o
siging NDA.