[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

/27 the new /24

Subject: /27 the new /24
From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 18:49:20 +0100
In-reply-to: <m24mi6llqc.wl%[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7BGBaQbHmA1zKgAM_pVD6fYZPqiBdOKT1CRhPh1jXRy=w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7BF_VVAXNonVV-o6o+c3nrHxk7nwaMBm_eE-S2tShWObQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <m24mi6llqc.wl%[email protected]>

On 04/10/2015 16:03, Randy Bush wrote:
> yet another ipv6 fantasy.  it may be in the powerpoint but it is not in
> the implementations.

the ipsec tickbox was removed from ipv6 in rfc6434 (2011).

Nick

References:
- AW: /27 the new /24
  - From: jj at anexia.at (Jürgen Jaritsch)
- AW: /27 the new /24
  - From: youssef at 720.fr (Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr)
- AW: /27 the new /24
  - From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- AW: /27 the new /24
  - From: wwaites at tardis.ed.ac.uk (William Waites)
- AW: /27 the new /24
  - From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- /27 the new /24
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- /27 the new /24
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)

Prev by Date: /27 the new /24
Next by Date: How to wish you hadn't forced ipv6 adoption (was "How to force rapid ipv6 adoption")
Previous by thread: /27 the new /24
Next by thread: /27 the new /24
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread