AW: /27 the new /24

[jj at anexia.at (Jürgen Jaritsch)]

As mentioned before: even the new SUP2T from Cisco is limited to 1Mio routes ...

There are MANY other vendors with the same limitations: Juniper, Brocade, etc

And the solt equipment is not the 99USD trash from the super market at the corner ...


J?rgen Jaritsch
Head of Network & Infrastructure

ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH

Telefon: +43-5-0556-300
Telefax: +43-5-0556-500

E-Mail: jj at anexia.at
Web: http://www.anexia.at

Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstra?e 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601


-----Original Message-----
From: Max Tulyev [maxtul at netassist.ua]
Received: Samstag, 03 Okt. 2015, 9:11
To: nanog at nanog.org [nanog at nanog.org]
Subject: Re: AW: /27 the new /24

Which routers? DIR-300 with OpenWRT/Quagga? :)

I think all above-the-trash level routers supports >1M routes, isn't it?

On 02.10.15 17:45, J?rgen Jaritsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this would at least help to get rid of many old routing engines around the world :) ... or people would keep their "learn nothing smaller than /24" filters in place. Also an option - but not for companies who act as an IP transit provider.
>
>
> best regards
>
> J?rgen Jaritsch
> Head of Network & Infrastructure
>
> ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
>
> Telefon: +43-5-0556-300
> Telefax: +43-5-0556-500
>
> E-Mail: JJaritsch at anexia-it.com
> Web: http://www.anexia-it.com
>
> Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstra?e 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander Windbichler
> Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
>
>
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] Im Auftrag von Justin Wilson - MTIN
> Gesendet: Freitag, 02. Oktober 2015 16:32
> An: NANOG
> Betreff: /27 the new /24
>
> I was in a discussion the other day and several Tier2 providers were talking about the idea of adjusting their BGP filters to accept prefixes smaller than a /24.  A few were saying they thought about going down to as small as a /27.  This was mainly due to more networks coming online and not having even a /24 of IPv4 space.  The first argument is against this is the potential bloat the global routing table could have.  Many folks have worked hard for years to summarize and such. others were saying they would do a /26 or bigger.
>
> However, what do we do about the new networks which want to do BGP but only can get small allocations from someone (either a RIR or one of their upstreams)?
>
> Just throwing that out there. Seems like an interesting discussion.
>
>
> Justin Wilson
> j2sw at mtin.net
>
> ---
> http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO
> xISP Solutions- Consulting ? Data Centers - Bandwidth
>
> http://www.midwest-ix.com  COO/Chairman
> Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric
>