[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Unlawful transfers of content and transfers of unlawful content (was:Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality)
- Subject: Unlawful transfers of content and transfers of unlawful content (was:Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality)
- From: donald.kasper at outlook.com (Donald Kasper)
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:58:18 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAP-guGVMFqY08opQxNfpQ_eEwUprNcu3p4=cch=Lpa8q0AUwjg@mail.gmail.com>, <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 15:48:31 -0400
> From: lowen at pari.edu
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Unlawful transfers of content and transfers of unlawful content (was:Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality)
>
> On 02/27/2015 02:14 PM, Jim Richardson wrote:
> > What's a "lawful" web site?
> >
> Paragraphs 304 and 305 in today's released R&O address some of this.
> The wording 'Unlawful transfers of content and transfers of unlawful
> content' is pretty good, and covers what the Commission wanted to cover.
>
More then website blocking I've been wondering what this means for spam prevention?