[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Unlawful transfers of content and transfers of unlawful content
- Subject: Unlawful transfers of content and transfers of unlawful content
- From: lowen at pari.edu (Lamar Owen)
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:14:35 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAP-guGVMFqY08opQxNfpQ_eEwUprNcu3p4=cch=Lpa8q0AUwjg@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/12/2015 04:58 PM, Donald Kasper wrote:
>
>
> More then website blocking I've been wondering what this means for
> spam prevention?
That's a pretty interesting thought, and it is pretty well addressed by
paragraphs 376, 377, and 378. Basically, the FCC found that spam
blocking is a separate add-on information service. It may be that the
consumer now must opt-in to that service after clear disclosure of what
the service entails. The FCC even found that DNS is not an information
service (paragraphs 366-371), and the argument is compelling. This
Commission is not technically illiterate, that's for sure, whether you
agree with the R&O or not.