[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
de-peering for security sake
- Subject: de-peering for security sake
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 05:14:14 +0900
- In-reply-to: <CAL9jLaZR57Nv4jCiY=8jxfGhn-yx=aVLeinznpGJdDmtjr_Zkw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <278703070.5666.1451139598778.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <[email protected]> <-1680641458761921693@unknownmsgid> <[email protected]> <CAEmG1=qXi4Qq=Othy-dVD_94hy5HHee2R=b1=pPO9kVy0oLYFg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7Cab3=2Xzmnx6+CJA0B7wBh-pfLOUXVEgFphCWetqfX4w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7CJ1K-=7k1qM+HEujPP0=qcSY1EPQiKU5SUOQzKGDRLug@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAL9jLaZR57Nv4jCiY=8jxfGhn-yx=aVLeinznpGJdDmtjr_Zkw@mail.gmail.com>
> 'cyber security' really isn't a whole lot different from 'lock your
> damned doors and windows' brick/mortar security.
hellofalot more holes to cover. and the salaries of the guards are a
bit higher for the net; so more incentive for pointy heads to skimp.
randy