[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Nat
Publicly shame them by listing the ones who don't fully support IPv6. List
them here, so we know to choose their competition.
On Dec 16, 2015 8:39 PM, "Berry Mobley" <berry at gadsdenst.org> wrote:
> At 08:22 PM 12/16/2015, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> > We need to put some pain onto everyone that is IPv4 only.
>>
>> this is the oppress the workers so they will revolt theory. load of
>> crap.
>>
>> make ipv6 easier to deploy, especially in enterprise. repeat the
>> previous sentence 42 times.
>>
>
> This. I'm in an enterprise with some stubborn vendors, and none of them
> are even talking about ipv6. It won't help me to move (and it won't help
> you to get well if you're here) if my users can't get to their stuff.
>
> Berry
>
- References:
- Nat
- From: ahmed.dalaali at hrins.net (Ahmed Munaf)
- Nat
- From: Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com (Livingood, Jason)
- Nat
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- Nat
- From: charles.lists at camonson.com (Charles Monson)
- Nat
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- Nat
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)