[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Nat

Subject: Nat
From: berry at gadsdenst.org (Berry Mobley)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 20:53:55 -0500
In-reply-to: <m24mfhj2d1.wl%[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <D29747F0.11F8D4%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAAbPayKVqf7r=77Jjks8WJOgm5eqFpD4OqUyTopKBPa2TRvQNA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <m24mfhj2d1.wl%[email protected]>

At 08:22 PM 12/16/2015, Randy Bush wrote:
> > We need to put some pain onto everyone that is IPv4 only.
>
>this is the oppress the workers so they will revolt theory.  load of
>crap.
>
>make ipv6 easier to deploy, especially in enterprise.  repeat the
>previous sentence 42 times.

This. I'm in an enterprise with some stubborn vendors, and none of 
them are even talking about ipv6. It won't help me to move (and it 
won't help you to get well if you're here) if my users can't get to 
their stuff.

Berry

References:
- Nat
  - From: ahmed.dalaali at hrins.net (Ahmed Munaf)
- Nat
  - From: Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com (Livingood, Jason)
- Nat
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- Nat
  - From: charles.lists at camonson.com (Charles Monson)
- Nat
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- Nat
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)

Prev by Date: Nat
Next by Date: Nat
Previous by thread: Nat
Next by thread: Nat
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread