[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
misunderstanding scale
- Subject: misunderstanding scale
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:37:41 -0400
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:13:43 -0400." <CAP-guGXeFppQ_oLfecc0asXP664x8Bqz2G-rt=P8uYaCKkSv5g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAP-guGUhOYXDuuwZtYO0YFKfBxto+0+T2w4+KSCQ7L=dzw=MQQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGXeFppQ_oLfecc0asXP664x8Bqz2G-rt=P8uYaCKkSv5g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:13:43 -0400, William Herrin said:
> You'd expect folks to give up two layers of security at exactly the
> same time as they're absorbing a new network protocol with which
> they're yet unskilled? Does that make sense to you from a
> risk-management standpoint?
The problem is that the two layers of "security" that they're "giving up"
are made from the same fabric as the Emperor's new clothes....
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140324/fee4095e/attachment.bin>