[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
misunderstanding scale
- Subject: misunderstanding scale
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:13:43 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAP-guGUhOYXDuuwZtYO0YFKfBxto+0+T2w4+KSCQ7L=dzw=MQQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Joe Greco <jgreco at ns.sol.net> wrote:
>> all successful security is about _defense in depth_.
>> If it is inaccessible, unrouted, unroutable and unaddressable then you
>> have four layers of security. If it is merely inaccessible and
>> unrouted you have two.
>
> Time to give up two layers of meaningless security for the riches offered
> by the vastness of the new address space.
Hi Joe,
You'd expect folks to give up two layers of security at exactly the
same time as they're absorbing a new network protocol with which
they're yet unskilled? Does that make sense to you from a
risk-management standpoint?
-Bill
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004