[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
On Jul 27, 2014, at 9:39 PM, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman at meetinghouse.net> wrote:
> Can you say more about what you've done to "survey and quantify" prevailing practices?
https://www.pch.net/resources/papers//peering-survey/PCH-Peering-Survey-2011.pdf
Weâ??ll do another one in the run-up to the next OECD carrier interconnection paper.
> Given that Netflix is reportedly about 1/3 of Internet traffic these days, and Verizon is huge - how does that come out to .27% of cases?
Netflix/Verizon would be 0.0007% of cases, if itâ??s represented in the dataset. The survey was of interconnection norms, not of hugeness.
-Bill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140727/70ffe907/attachment.pgp>
- References:
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: pauldotwall at gmail.com (Paul WALL)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: richard at bennett.com (Richard Bennett)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: richard at bennett.com (Richard Bennett)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: richard at bennett.com (Richard Bennett)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: woody at pch.net (Bill Woodcock)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: mfidelman at meetinghouse.net (Miles Fidelman)