[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 09:08:17PM -0700, Richard Bennett wrote:
> I don't think it's conflation, Joly, since the essence of NN is for
> the eyeballs to pay for the entire cost of the network and for edge
> providers to use it for free; isn't that what Netflix is asking the
> FCC to impose under the guise of "strong net neutrality?"
In a word: no. Net neutrality is about everyone paying their own way to get
their packets to where they want them to go. Netflix doesn't get to use the
Internet "for free"; they pay a whole heck of a lot each month to L3 and
Cogent.
- Matt
- References:
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: pauldotwall at gmail.com (Paul WALL)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: richard at bennett.com (Richard Bennett)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: richard at bennett.com (Richard Bennett)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: richard at bennett.com (Richard Bennett)