[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Inevitable death, was Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix
- Subject: Inevitable death, was Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix
- From: nanog at brettglass.com (Brett Glass)
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 17:45:56 -0600
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAP4=VciHrbGRiNHAyyZPSTVNpabDOJuRLAmBUjK+hbnMgMBP1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAMrdfRz_9ccn+wGay3_zUaP=xa=4RpjQ1Hp06M8xwF-kedSB-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAEmG1=prUtD+6GTSQNNaRDs9T2JuCWYvaOp4o0UrE_VYAGr-jw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
At 02:42 PM 7/14/2014, George Herbert wrote:
> > On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:41 AM, Matthew Petach <mpetach at netflight.com> wrote:
> >
> > Brett's concerns seem to center around his
> > ability to be cost-competitive with the big
> > guys in his area...which implies there *are*
> > big guys in his area to have to compete with.
>
>He 's running wireless links, from web and prior info as I
>recall. His key business seems to be outside the cable tv / DSL
>wire loop ranges from wire centers. The bigger services seem to
>have fiber into Laramie, and Brett seems to have fiber to that
>Denver exchange pointlet .
>
>Why he's not getting fiber to a bigger exchange point or better
>transit is unclear.
Why don't you simply ask me? There have been a huge number of
incorrect, mostly speculative assertions made about my business in
this thread, but I simply don't have time to correct all of them (I
have a business to run and customers to help).
--Brett Glass